Objective: To compare the outcome of patients with uteri > 250 gm who had minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) to those who had abdominal hysterectomy (AH) using the LigaSure, stratify complications based on the uterine weight and report follow-up of patients who had vaginal morcellation. Study Design: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with uteri > 250 gms who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RTLH) to those who underwent AH. In both groups the LigaSure was used. Patients who had vaginal morcellation were followed-up. Results: A total of 166 patients were included: 10 patients had VH, 81 patients had LAVH, 22 patients had RTLH, and 53 patients had AH. Six (5%) MIH were converted to AH. Sixty-four percent of patients who needed hysterectomy were able to have successful MIH. Both groups were similar regarding age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous laparotomy, previous C sections, body mass index, estimated blood loss, operative and postoperative complications, and final pathology report. The conversion and complication rates increased with uterine weight > 1000 gm. Patients who had AH had larger uteri and stayed in the hospital longer than those who had MIH. Thirty patients had vaginal morcellation with no consequences. Conclusion: Most patients with a large uterus could have save MIH with shorter hospital stay. Conversion and complications increase for uteri larger than 1000 gm. Vaginal morcellation had no consequences and the use of LigaSure provided adequate hemostasis.
| Published in | Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Volume 10, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17 |
| Page(s) | 203-210 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Hysterectomy, Minimally Invasive, Laparoscopic, Robotic, Uterine Weight, Large Uterus
| [1] | Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 1091-5. |
| [2] | Merrill RM. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United Sates, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 2008; 14: CR24-31. |
| [3] | Nieboer TE, Hendricks JC, Bongers MY, Vierhout ME, Kluivers KB. Quality of life after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119 (1): 85-91. |
| [4] | ACOG Committee Opinion No. 701: Choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129-e155-9. |
| [5] | Louie M, Strassle PD, Moulder JK, Dizon AM, Schiff LD, VCarey ET. Uterine weight and complications after abdominal, laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219 (5): 480-8. |
| [6] | Uccella S, Cromi A, Serati M, Casarin J, Sturla D, Ghezzi F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in case of uteri weighing > 1 kilogram: A series of 71 cases and review of the literature. JMIG 2014; 21: 460-5. |
| [7] | Silas DA, Gallo T, Silasi M, Mederes G, Azodi M. Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri. JSLS 2013: 17: 400-6. |
| [8] | Schmidtt JO, Baker MV, Occhino JA, McGee ME, Weaver AL, Bakkum-Games J, Dowdy DC, Pasupathy KS, Gebhart JB. Prospective implementation and evaluation of a decision-tree algorithm for route of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 1345 (4): 761-9. |
| [9] | Sinha R, Bana R, Sanjay M. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for the large uterus. JSJS 2019; 23 (1): 1-7. |
| [10] | Doucette RC, Sharp HT, Alder SC. Challenging generally accepted contraindications to vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 184 (7): 1386-91. |
| [11] | Emery SL, Boulvain M, Petignat P, Dubuisson J. Operative complications, and outcome comparing small and large uterine weight in case of laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication. Front in Surg 2021; 8: 1-6. |
| [12] | Mistrangelo E, Febo G, Ferrero B, Ferrero S, Deltetto F, Camanni M. Safety, and efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy in the large uterus with the LigaSure bipolar diathermy system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (5): 475-80. |
| [13] | Bicer M, Guner Z, Karas C, Guclu A, Gol M. Using the LigaSure vessel sealing device in the large uterus at laparoscopic hysterectomy. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2016; 43 (6); 880-2. |
| [14] | Smorgick N, Dalton VK, Patzkowasky KE, Hoffman MR, Advincula AP. As-Sanie S, Comparison of 2 minimally invasive routes for hysterectomy of large uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2103; 122: 128-31. |
| [15] | Uccella S. Kho RM, Garzon S, Casarin J, Zorazato PC, C-Ghezi F. The large uterus classification system: A prospective observational study. BJOG 2021; 128: 1626-33. |
| [16] | ACOG Committee Opinion No. 822. Uterine morcellation for presumed leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137 (3): e63-e74. |
| [17] | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. UPDATED laparoscopic uterine power morcellation in hysterectomy and myomectomy: FDA safety communication [archived]. Silver Spring (MD): FDA; 2014. Available at https://wayback.arciveit.org/7993/2070404182209/https: www.fda/gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertandNotices/ucm42443.htm.Retrived November 5, 2018. |
| [18] | Ottarsdottir H, Cohen SL, Cox M, Vitonis A, Einarsso JI. Trends in mode of hysterectomy after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration power morcellation advisory. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 129: 1014-21. |
| [19] | Hefni MA, Bhaumik J, El-Toukhy T, Kho P, Wong I, Abdel-Razik T, Davies AE. Safety and efficacy of using the LigaSure vessel sealing system for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy: randomized controlled trial. BJOG 2005; 112 (3): -329-33. |
| [20] | Tuland T, Balayla J. Study designs and the use of the Canadian Task Force classification. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018; 40 (11): 1383-4. |
| [21] | Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (2): 205-013. |
| [22] | Einarsson JI, Matteson KA, Schulkin J, Chavan NR, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. Minimally invasive hysterectomies- A survey on attitudes and barriers among practicing gynecologists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17 (2): 167-175. |
| [23] | Druzijanic N, Pogorelic Zm Perko Z, Mrklic I, Tomic S. Comparison of lateral thermal damage of the human peritoneum using monopolar diathermy, Harmonic scalpel and LigaSure. Can J Surg 2021; 55 (5): 317-21. |
| [24] | Lyons SD, Law KSK. Laparoscopic vessel sealing technologies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013; 20: 301-7. |
| [25] | Diamantis T, Gialikaris S, Kontos M, et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of ultrasonic and bipolar thermal energy: an experimental study. Surg Laparosc Endosco Percutan Tech 2008, 18: 384-90. |
| [26] | Aarts JWM, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Gary R, Willem B, Mol B, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015; 8. Art. No.: CD003677. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5. |
| [27] | Pratt JH, Gunnalaugsson GH. Vaginal hysterectomy by morcellation. Mayo Clinic Proc 1970; 45: 374-87. |
| [28] | Falcone T, Stovall TG. Hysterectomy, In Berek JS, editor. Berek & Novak’s gynecology. 15th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2012. P. 203-42. |
| [29] | Hong MK, Wei YC, Chu TY, Wang JH, Ding DC. Safety and efficacy of contained manual morcellation during laparoscopic or robotic gynecological surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2020; 148: 168-73. |
| [30] | Cohen SL, Morris SN, Brown DN, Greenberg JA, Walsh BW, Gargiulo AR, et al. Contained tissue extraction using power morcellation: prospective evaluation of leakage parameters. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 214: 257. e1-7. |
| [31] | Ramos A, Fader AN, Roche KL. Surgical cytoreduction for disseminated benign disease after open power uterine morcellation. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 99-102. |
| [32] | Siedhoff MT, Wheeler SB, Rutstein SE, Geller EJ, Doll KM, WU JM, Clark-Pearson DL. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation versus abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroids in premenopausal women: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2105; 212 (5): e591-8. |
| [33] | Crosignani PG, Vercellini P, Meschia M, Oldani T, Bramante T. GnRH agnostic before surgery for uterine leiomyomas. Review. J Reprod Med 1966; 41 (6): 415-21. |
APA Style
Gamal Hassan Eltabbakh, Samantha Gregoire, Georgia Danine Eltabbakh. (2022). Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus Using the LigaSure. Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 10(4), 203-210. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17
ACS Style
Gamal Hassan Eltabbakh; Samantha Gregoire; Georgia Danine Eltabbakh. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus Using the LigaSure. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2022, 10(4), 203-210. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17,
author = {Gamal Hassan Eltabbakh and Samantha Gregoire and Georgia Danine Eltabbakh},
title = {Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus Using the LigaSure},
journal = {Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics},
volume = {10},
number = {4},
pages = {203-210},
doi = {10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jgo.20221004.17},
abstract = {Objective: To compare the outcome of patients with uteri > 250 gm who had minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) to those who had abdominal hysterectomy (AH) using the LigaSure, stratify complications based on the uterine weight and report follow-up of patients who had vaginal morcellation. Study Design: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with uteri > 250 gms who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RTLH) to those who underwent AH. In both groups the LigaSure was used. Patients who had vaginal morcellation were followed-up. Results: A total of 166 patients were included: 10 patients had VH, 81 patients had LAVH, 22 patients had RTLH, and 53 patients had AH. Six (5%) MIH were converted to AH. Sixty-four percent of patients who needed hysterectomy were able to have successful MIH. Both groups were similar regarding age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous laparotomy, previous C sections, body mass index, estimated blood loss, operative and postoperative complications, and final pathology report. The conversion and complication rates increased with uterine weight > 1000 gm. Patients who had AH had larger uteri and stayed in the hospital longer than those who had MIH. Thirty patients had vaginal morcellation with no consequences. Conclusion: Most patients with a large uterus could have save MIH with shorter hospital stay. Conversion and complications increase for uteri larger than 1000 gm. Vaginal morcellation had no consequences and the use of LigaSure provided adequate hemostasis.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus Using the LigaSure AU - Gamal Hassan Eltabbakh AU - Samantha Gregoire AU - Georgia Danine Eltabbakh Y1 - 2022/08/10 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17 DO - 10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17 T2 - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JF - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics JO - Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics SP - 203 EP - 210 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7820 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jgo.20221004.17 AB - Objective: To compare the outcome of patients with uteri > 250 gm who had minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) to those who had abdominal hysterectomy (AH) using the LigaSure, stratify complications based on the uterine weight and report follow-up of patients who had vaginal morcellation. Study Design: A retrospective cohort study comparing patients with uteri > 250 gms who underwent vaginal hysterectomy (VH), laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and robotic total laparoscopic hysterectomy (RTLH) to those who underwent AH. In both groups the LigaSure was used. Patients who had vaginal morcellation were followed-up. Results: A total of 166 patients were included: 10 patients had VH, 81 patients had LAVH, 22 patients had RTLH, and 53 patients had AH. Six (5%) MIH were converted to AH. Sixty-four percent of patients who needed hysterectomy were able to have successful MIH. Both groups were similar regarding age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, previous laparotomy, previous C sections, body mass index, estimated blood loss, operative and postoperative complications, and final pathology report. The conversion and complication rates increased with uterine weight > 1000 gm. Patients who had AH had larger uteri and stayed in the hospital longer than those who had MIH. Thirty patients had vaginal morcellation with no consequences. Conclusion: Most patients with a large uterus could have save MIH with shorter hospital stay. Conversion and complications increase for uteri larger than 1000 gm. Vaginal morcellation had no consequences and the use of LigaSure provided adequate hemostasis. VL - 10 IS - 4 ER -
Email: