Volume 5, Issue 2, March 2017, Page: 25-30
A Three Year Retrospective Study of Caesarean Section Rate at Tanta University Hospitals
Ayman Shehata Dawood, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Abdel-Ghafar Said Dawood, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Shereef Lotfy El-Shwaikh, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
Received: Feb. 22, 2017;       Accepted: Mar. 6, 2017;       Published: Mar. 24, 2017
DOI: 10.11648/j.jgo.20170502.11      View  1614      Downloads  98
Abstract
This Retrospective observational study was done to determine the actual Caesarean Section rate at Tanta University Hospitals (a tertiary care hospital). Review of all deliveries that have been conducted at Tanta University Hospitals whether Vaginal or Caesarean Section in the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 and detection of the most common causes of the Caesarean Section. The total number of deliveries was 3592, 3342, and 3320 in the years 2013, 2014 and 2015 respectively. The Rate of cesarean section was (1049/3592) 41% in 2013, (1004/23342) 45% in 2014, and (1057/3320) 46% in 2015. The CS rate was high at Tanta University Hospital, and there was slight increase in the rate through the period of study. The most common indication for cesarean section was previous cesarean section. The conclusion is that the rate of cesarean section was so high at Tanta University Hospital and much higher than WHO recommendation for developing countries. The rate of cesarean section showed minimal but continuous rise in the past three years.
Keywords
Caesarean Section Rate, Epidemic, Tertiary Care Hospitals
To cite this article
Ayman Shehata Dawood, Abdel-Ghafar Said Dawood, Shereef Lotfy El-Shwaikh, A Three Year Retrospective Study of Caesarean Section Rate at Tanta University Hospitals, Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2017, pp. 25-30. doi: 10.11648/j.jgo.20170502.11
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Reference
[1]
Dosa L. Caesarean section delivery, and increasingly popular option. Bull World Health Organ. 2001; 79: 1173-1175.
[2]
Betrán AP., Merialdi M., Lauer JA., Bing-Shun W., Thomas J., Van Look P., Wagner M. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21, 98-113.
[3]
Kaimal AJ, Kuppermann M. Decision making for primary cesarean delivery: the role of patients and provider preferences. Semin Perinatol, 2012. 36: 384-389.
[4]
Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The Increasing Trend in Caesarean Section Rates: Global, Regional and National Estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS ONE. 2016. 11 (2): e0148343.
[5]
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies (2014), “2013 Turkey Demographic and Health Survey”. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies. T. R. Ministry of Development and TÜBĐTAK, Ankara, Turkey.
[6]
Ono T, Matsuda Y, Sasaki K, Satoh S, Tsuji S, Kimura F, Murakami T. Comparative analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson Ten-Group Classification System and Lorenz curve in the main institutions in Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Sep 19.
[7]
Einarsdóttir K, Ball S, Pereira G, Griffin C, Jacoby P, de Klerk N, Leonard H, Stanley ‎FJ. Changes in Caesarean Delivery Rates in Western Australia from 1995 to 2010 by ‎Gestational Age at Birth‏.‏‎ Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015; 29: 290-8. ‎
[8]
Luz G., José M., Jeremy A., Ana P., Mario M. Fernando A. The Global Numbers and Costs of Additionally Needed and Unnecessary Caesarean Sections Performed per Year: Overuse as a Barrier to Universal Coverage. World Health Report (2010), Background Paper, 30.
[9]
Ministry of Health and Populations [Egypt], El-Zanaty Associates [Egypt], ICF International. The 2014 Egypt demographic and Health Survey (2014 EDHS). Main Findings. Cairo, Egypt 2015.
[10]
Yassin K., Saida G. Levels and Determinants of Caesarean Deliveries in Egypt: Pathways to Rationalization. Internet Journal of World Health and Societal Politics. 2012; 7, 1-8.
[11]
Zwecker P, Azoulay L, Abenhaim HA. Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice. Am J Perinatol. 2011; 28: 277–84.
[12]
Ellerstein S, Feldman S, Duan T. China's 50% caesarean delivery rate: is it too high? BJOG. 2015; 122: 160–4.
[13]
Mi J, Liu F. Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China. Lancet. 2014; 383 (9927): 1463–4.
[14]
Raisanen S, Gissler M, Kramer MR, Heinonen S. Influence of delivery characteristics and socioeconomic status on giving birth by caesarean section—a cross sectional study during 2000–2010 in Finland. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014; 14 (1).
[15]
Macfarlane A, Blondel B, Mohangoo A, Cuttini M, Nijhuis J, Novak Z, et al. Wide differences in mode of delivery within Europe: risk-stratified analyses of aggregated routine data from the Euro-Peristat study. BJOG. 2015.
[16]
Grobman WA, Lai Y, Landon MB. The change in the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2011; 25, 37–43.
[17]
Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001; 12: 23–39.
[18]
Dan F., Debra Sh, Michael R. Classification of Caesarean Sections in Canada: The Modified Robson Criteria J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34, 976–979.
[19]
Alaa-Eldin E., Ahmed K., Adel N., Wael F., Ahmed S. caesarean Section In A University and General Tertiary Hospitals in Cairo; Egypt: Rates, Indications and Limits. Kasr Al-Aini Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011; 2, 45-49.
[20]
Waleed El-Khayat; Doaa Adel; Moustafa Abd El-Bar; Mohamed Waly. Cesarean Section Rate at a Tertiary University Hospital in Egypt in Five Years Period (2008 -2012). KAJOG; Kasr Al-Aini Journal Of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2013. 4 (3). 66-74.
[21]
Ihab Serag, Allam Ihab, Adel Gomaa, Hisham Mohamed Fathi, Ghada Fathi, Mahmoud Sukkar. Incidence of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in Ain-shams University Maternity Hospital, Egypt: a retrospective study. Arch Gynecol Obstet (2014) 290: 891–896.
[22]
El-Zanaty F. Ann W. Egypt Demographic and Health Survey 2008. Cairo, Egypt: ‎Ministry of Health. ‎
[23]
Abdel Aleem H, Shaaban OM, Hassanin AI, Ibraheem AA. Analysis of cesarean delivery at Assiut University Hospital using the Ten Group Classification System. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013; 123 (2): 119– 23.
[24]
Gossman GL, Hoesch JM, Tanfer K. Trends in maternal request cesarean delivery from 1991 to 2005. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 1506–1516.
[25]
Driul L., Londero AP., Salvador S., Fruscalzo A., Peris Bhat SA., Citossi A., Fabiani G., Bertozzi S., Marchesoni D. Retrospective analysis of one year of cesarean sections: indications and risk factors associated with intrapartum cesarean section, Minerva Ginecol. 2010; 62, 403-14.
[26]
Santhanalakshmi C. Vijayalakshmi G. Chakravarthy A. Retrospective Analysis of Cesarean Section in a Tertiary Care Hospital, international Journal of Science and Research 2015; 4, 9-12.
Browse journals by subject